The Great Reset is publicly available information from the World Economic Forum (WEF) website. It is a topic of conversation that is gaining the interest of your average citizen in every sovereign nation—and for good reason, too. Since the 1970s, The Great Reset has been an actual pursuit to change how societies have functioned for the last several centuries, from economic to social policies. There’s speculation about the true nature of some of the global crises we’ve seen in the last few years, too; their timing is almost too perfect to be coincidental. That said, let’s see what we can conclude from the given information.
World Economic Forum
For starters, we must understand what WEF is. It was founded in 1971 by a man whose name will pop up repeatedly throughout this article: Klaus Schwab. It was originally called the European Management Forum, before rebranding to World Economic Forum in 1987. Schwab’s main focus originally was for European firms to “catch up with US management practices.” Schwab “also developed and promoted the ‘stakeholder’ management approach, which based corporate success on managers taking account of all interests: not merely shareholders, clients and customers, but employees and the communities within which they operate, including government.” This was done while it was known as the European Management Forum. As the organization grew in its influence around the globe, they helped China transition into opening up the markets. That influence reached a peak in 2015, when they were formally recognized as an international organization. What’s their main purpose now? According to the information found, the next phase is to “journey as the global platform for public-private cooperation.” This is where we get The Great Reset. I want to break this down into two categories: the economic reset, and the societal reset.
Economic Reset
After Schwab started his European Economic Forum in 1971, a manifesto was established in 1973 known as the Davos Manifesto. This outlined the purposes of a healthy free market functioning. This was kept until 2020, when a new Davos Manifesto became official as a result of the COVID pandemic. Here is the manifesto in their own words:
• A company serves its customers by providing a value proposition that best meets their needs. It accepts and supports fair competition and a level playing field. It has zero tolerance for corruption. It keeps the digital ecosystem in which it operates reliable and trustworthy. It makes customers fully aware of the functionality of its products and services, including adverse implications or negative externalities.
• A company treats its people with dignity and respect. It honours diversity and strives for continuous improvements in working conditions and employee well-being. In a world of rapid change, a company fosters continued employability through ongoing upskilling and reskilling.
• A company considers its suppliers as true partners in value creation. It provides a fair chance to new market entrants. It integrates respect for human rights into the entire supply chain.
• A company serves society at large through its activities, supports the communities in which it works, and pays its fair share of taxes. It ensures the safe, ethical and efficient use of data. It acts as a steward of the environmental and material universe for future generations. It consciously protects our biosphere and champions a circular, shared and regenerative economy. It continuously expands the frontiers of knowledge, innovation and technology to improve people’s well-being.
• A company provides its shareholders with a return on investment that takes into account the incurred entrepreneurial risks and the need for continuous innovation and sustained investments. It responsibly manages near-term, medium-term and long-term value creation in pursuit of sustainable shareholder returns that do not sacrifice the future for the present.
• A company is more than an economic unit generating wealth. It fulfils human and societal aspirations as part of the broader social system. Performance must be measured not only on the return to shareholders, but also on how it achieves its environmental, social and good governance objectives. Executive remuneration should reflect stakeholder responsibility.
• A company that has a multinational scope of activities not only serves all those stakeholders who are directly engaged, but acts itself as a stakeholder – together with governments and civil society – of our global future. Corporate global citizenship requires a company to harness its core competencies, its entrepreneurship, skills and relevant resources in collaborative efforts with other companies and stakeholders to improve the state of the world.
According to the manifesto, the purpose is for companies “to engage all its stakeholders in shared and sustained value creation. In creating such value, a company serves not only its shareholders, but all its stakeholders – employees, customers, suppliers, local communities and society at large. The best way to understand and harmonize the divergent interests of all stakeholders is through a shared commitment to policies and decisions that strengthen the long-term prosperity of a company.” Some may be confused by the term “stakeholder.” Schwab breaks down capitalism into three groups: shareholder, whose main purpose is to maximize profit; state capitalism, where the government controls all the means of production in the economy; and stakeholders, which is the current goal. Essentially, it is a mixture of both shareholder and state capitalism. That’s their perspective, but if we were to put this in blatant terms, they want to remake capitalism into socialism—and the goal of socialism is communism. They beat around the bush by using the term “capitalism,” in hopes that the population will remain ignorant to what defines an economic system. This is needed, according to the Schwab elites, because the shareholder capitalism module “had neglected the fact that a publicly listed corporation is not just a profit-seeking entity but also a social organism. Together with financial-industry pressures to boost short-term results, the single-minded focus on profits caused shareholder capitalism to become increasingly disconnected from the real economy.” The language is similar to Karl Marx’s paradigm concerning capitalism. Is Klaus Schwab a Marxist? There’s no direct evidence that he’s a declared Marxist, however based on his worldview and statements such as, “you’ll own nothing and be happy,” one can reasonably conclude that Karl Marx is an influential figure for him. And in a Marxist society, the state and elite benefit the most.
Societal Reset
This is in alignment with Karl Marx’s worldview that the state should essentially control everything, from speech to economic policies. And if you go against the state at any point, there are consequences. For this to become a reality, steps must be taken to idolize the state. The state is the source of truth, morality, and values. If you can accomplish this, then you can control the population. This of course requires manipulating people into thinking separation of church and state entails taking the spiritual perspective out in all aspects of debate; and, if you recall, Karl Marx called religion an “opium of the masses.” Do this, and you can establish a social credit system (another publicly available document). This system is based on the social credit system in China, a communist regime. But people like Klaus Schwab want to implement this on a global scale. China’s government exercises control of their people through surveillance cameras, facial recognition software, complaints from others, official documents, and records from medical, business, and government entities. Afterwards, a social credit score is given to individuals and companies. Those who comply with the imposed social credit system are rewarded materially and socially; those who don’t are penalized. The factors for a company’s score include:
• Whether the business has paid taxes on time
• Whether the business maintains necessary licenses
• Whether the business fulfills environmental protection requirements
• Whether the business meets product quality standards
• Whether the business meets requirements specific to their industry
Then, for individuals, the purpose of their social credit score is to determine their “trustworthiness.” The factors are the following:
• Loitering
• Smoking in no-smoking areas
• Spending too much time on video games
• Paying bills on time
• Visiting your sick parents
• Spreading fake news
• When driving, stopping in front of crosswalks
Notice the “fake news” factor. If the state controls speech, then fake news could constitute simply defying the propaganda they spread. Questioning the narrative. Free speech dies with this social credit system, especially if you can convince the population that the state is their main provider, and the ultimate source of objective truth. Why does this matter? Because in this system, unless you comply 100% with the government standards, your livelihood could be negatively impacted. The state will strip more rights away; strip away economic opportunities to move out of poverty; strip away access to basic needs; only because you’ve been deemed by the government to be “untrustworthy.” And their idea of trustworthiness is for someone to not question anything that comes out of the state’s mouth.
Conclusions
The given information about WEF is direct evidence of their agenda. This is all publicly available information. Their mindset is in plain writing: that with every crisis, there is an opportunity to push their agenda. The pandemic was one of them, as are economic woes (such as inflation and energy policies) and the Russia-Ukraine war; and they’ve predicted a cyber security crisis that will alter people’s way of life and access to basic needs. This translates into the idea that with every crisis, there’s a window of opportunity to strip more freedoms away and give more power to the state.
This state is eerily similar to the one described in George’s Orwell’s “1984” book. This is globalism on the extreme scale, where national identity and sovereignty don’t exist. Individual freedom ceases to exist as well. What I cannot conclude is how well-executed the push for this reset has been. It seems that Klaus Schwab, global leaders, and the rest of his puppets highly overestimated people’s willingness to give up their liberties. Because of that, there are some aspects one can allude to as evidence that they’ve been largely unsuccessful.
Nobody can dispute, however, that these are their intentions. Did global elites manufacture the crises? There’s no direct evidence of that; yet, based on the circumstances, one could reasonably conclude that they seemed more planned than mere coincidence—the timing is definitely suspicious and worth investigating. Whenever we talk about humanity, we can never underestimate the level of depravity one will go to to seize or maintain power. Especially if there’s money to be gained from this system by the global elite; ultimately, money will drive a person’s conscience. The love of money is, after all, the root of all evil.
Author’s Note: Anything underlined is a link for you to click on if desired. Readers are encouraged to educate themselves and seek other sources for information.